View Single Post
Old 19th-April-2005, 10:33 PM   #10 (permalink)
bigdjiver
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: bedford
Posts: 3,889
Status: No Status
Rep Power: 3 Rep.: 801
bigdjiver is a glorious beacon of lightbigdjiver is a glorious beacon of lightbigdjiver is a glorious beacon of lightbigdjiver is a glorious beacon of lightbigdjiver is a glorious beacon of lightbigdjiver is a glorious beacon of lightbigdjiver is a glorious beacon of light
Re: WCS- very nice video clip

One of the reasons I come to this forum is to learn and to refine my opinions.

To my unsophisticated eye much of the WCS action above the waist in these clips looks like MJ. Is there any characteristic, above the waist, that makes all of these clips identifiable as WCS?

Otherwise do I take it if I walked through the routines most would pass as MJ?

In the past fortnight "Syncopated Butterfly Kicks" and a "Cha-Cha" move have been taught in Ceroc Intermediate classes I attend, and triple step, chasse rock step and back step have all been mentioned. Presumably the use of this footwork is usable outside of the particular moves in which they were taught, and it would still be regarded as MJ.

So, am I right that I could walk through most of those routines, with the occasional bit of flash footwork, and still have it regarded as MJ?

What I would consider terribly sad if the amount of such footwork that was put in to make the routine eligible for disqualification as WCS was about the amount that made the routine look too good to be MJ.
bigdjiver is offline   Reply With Quote