View Single Post
Old 7th-August-2003, 01:46 PM   #8 (permalink)
spindr
Registered User
 
spindr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Basingstoke
Posts: 1,565
Status: No Status
Rep Power: 3 Rep.: 688
spindr is a glorious beacon of lightspindr is a glorious beacon of lightspindr is a glorious beacon of lightspindr is a glorious beacon of lightspindr is a glorious beacon of lightspindr is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Re: Talking 'bout a revolution

Quote:
Originally posted by Chicklet
Was "quoting" from the NZ assessment requirements and assuming they meant a double time spin - and I completely agree - I love to see them!!
But how often do you see guys dance them in freestyle ?

Quote:

Reason I picked this one for further discussion is that, as far as I can tell,
... a spin ... - it's kinda stand alone isn't it?
Is there anything "advanced" that one wouldn't be able to do because they couldn't do a double spin??
You're absolutely right with a "freespin" you're going to be completely disconnected and won't actually affect your partner as such -- of course you get the same effect by releasing hands and just doing a whole number revolutions less (or even just standing still).

I guess that the closest thing I can suggest are things like overturned free-spins (with taking hold part-way through the spin), e.g. spin 360 degrees catch Rl hands and spin a further 180 degrees to end up wrapped into the hands and backing your partner -- of course you could have simply done a 180 degree rotation (with hold). Same effect with a man-spin turning 360 + 180, or just turning 180?
I know which looks more interesting.

I suppose the intent is that being able to do a double spin means that your single spins and turns should be really snappy. Hence, lasso moves should be smooth, etc., etc.

Neil.

P.S. now I think about it there is a move that's often much easier to do after a double spin -- called the pick yourself up off of the floor I believe it's common to many dance styles.
spindr is offline   Reply With Quote