View Single Post
Old 7th-September-2006, 02:23 PM   #8 (permalink)
robd
Basically lazy
 
robd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Nr Cambridge
Posts: 2,626
Status: No Status
Rep Power: 3 Rep.: 1665
robd is a name known to allrobd is a name known to allrobd is a name known to allrobd is a name known to allrobd is a name known to allrobd is a name known to allrobd is a name known to allrobd is a name known to allrobd is a name known to allrobd is a name known to allrobd is a name known to all
Re: Dance: Art, Sport or Science ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TA Guy View Post
They talk about technique like it's some holy grail, which, if you find it, WOW! You are a dancer! It's complete crap. Technique on it's own is useless. Technique is merely a means to an end. Some of the most technically gifted dancers are the most boring or most mechanical.
This reminds me, in a tangential way, of something Ron Atkinson said relating to football. Can't remember the exact quote but it was along the lines of 'Technique is being able to trap a ball or pass a ball or head a ball. Skill is being able to do that whilst a 6' 4 centre-half is trying to kick you up in the air' so, yes, technique alone is not enough. I can trap a ball and pass a ball (I'm rubbish at heading it ) but nowhere near well enough in a match situation. I play football but I would not describe myself as a footballer. Likewise I dance but I would never describe myself to other people as a dancer. Perhaps Ron's definition of skill as it would be applied to someone dancing is what separates those who dance from those who are dancers?

Robert

Last edited by robd; 7th-September-2006 at 02:30 PM. Reason: Multi-quoting like a muppet!
robd is offline   Reply With Quote