View Single Post
Old 7th-September-2006, 02:49 PM   #14 (permalink)
ducasi
Lovely Moderator
 
ducasi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 9,747
Status: simply bushed!
Rep Power: 6 Rep.: 3377
ducasi is a splendid one to beholdducasi is a splendid one to beholdducasi is a splendid one to beholdducasi is a splendid one to beholdducasi is a splendid one to beholdducasi is a splendid one to beholdducasi is a splendid one to beholdducasi is a splendid one to beholdducasi is a splendid one to beholdducasi is a splendid one to beholdducasi is a splendid one to behold
Re: Dance: Art, Sport or Science ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geordieed
Good technique can improve us but doesn't necessarily make us a better dancer. Ceroc doesn't teach us how to dance. I apologise if this offends anyone but Ceroc only teaches us moves. It is up to the people doing it to make it into a dance. It has been said before that Ceroc is a framework to which we add the body to and give it form.
I disagree. Ceroc teaches us moves to music. Moving to music is dancing. It might not be good dancing, but it is dancing. In regular classes you'll also find a lot of good technique taught. Maybe not explicitly, but it's in there.

Beyond the regular class nights Ceroc teaches us further technique, things about musicality, and how to adapt moves to the music, etc...

Of course, it takes the person doing the dancing to understand and apply all this to their dancing.
__________________
Let your mind go and your body will follow. – Steve Martin, LA Story
ducasi is offline   Reply With Quote