| Re: Sterilisation of all unemployed ?
It seems to me that no-one disputes or is able to dispute the fact that we have more people of working age in this country than we have jobs for them to do.
If so, that means that whatever happens, there will be unemployed people.
If there are unemployed people, is it better for them to be paid to survive by the state, or to be left to their own devices and make a living by petty crime? - think of Fagin and his wild boys.
I'd sooner the state paid for them. Yes it's a drain on our resources but may very well be cheaper than the alternative; it's more civilised, and I prefer to live in a more civilised society; and it probably produces less fear and loathing than the alternative as well.
If some people don't want to work, might as well pay them benefits. If there must be unemployed people, why not? |