View Single Post
Old 25th-March-2008, 11:04 PM   #18 (permalink)
Trouble
Senior Member
 
Trouble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Waltham abbey
Posts: 3,390
Status: feeling the lurve :)
Rep Power: 2 Rep.: 984
Trouble is a glorious beacon of lightTrouble is a glorious beacon of lightTrouble is a glorious beacon of lightTrouble is a glorious beacon of lightTrouble is a glorious beacon of lightTrouble is a glorious beacon of lightTrouble is a glorious beacon of lightTrouble is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Sterilisation of all unemployed ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry Shnikov View Post

If some people don't want to work, might as well pay them benefits. If there must be unemployed people, why not?
yes there must be employed people of course there will. But why then do they bring more and more children into the world that they are unable to care for properly or give the best start in life. Dont get me wrong, some unemployed parents do give their children the best they can but some dont and some do have children to get more financial aid from the government.

Most working people can hardly afford one child. Some unemployed parents and by parents i mean couples, have over three children. Im not suggesting that enforced sterilisation is the answer of course im not, i dont know what the answer is. It does happen though doesn't it ???- children = bigger benefits?
__________________
LIFE IS ONE BIG BAG FULL OF SURPRISES !!
Trouble is offline   Reply With Quote