robd wrote:Well, that's one interpretation but by the same token I could choose to dance it on the '3'. I think that would be wrong but by your definition it would just be different. At some point there is a concensus of opinion which forms an accepted way of doing something.
ho hum, I thought I covered this in "She explained it is more of a snobery, or lack of knowledge thing, if you need to stick to one view on it."
So is it snobery, or a lack of knowlege?
Here is a clip from wiki, in case it is indeed a lack of knowledge...
"There are three flavors of cha-cha-cha dance, differing by the place of the cha-cha-cha chasse with respect to the musical bar. The original Cuban Cha-cha-cha and the Ballroom Cha-cha-cha count "two-three-chachacha".
Country/western cha-cha-cha and Latin street cha-cha-cha in some places other than Cuba count "one-two-chachacha" or "chachacha-three-four"."
robd wrote:
It seems that Cha Cha on the '1' is the predominant style for MJ dancers dancing or teaching Cha Cha to other MJ dancers - perhaps the issue is with them calling it cha cha rather than just Latin jive or something similarly generic?
Not really, it is still cha cha cha.
In the same way you can do a circle to start your MJ, and I can do a push back, we are still dancing MJ.
You could argue that bringing American Country/Western cha cha cha and Street Latin cha cha cha into MJ is not the way to go, but then you would also need to look at WCS, another American product.
